"Companions on the Journey: The Spirituality of Friendship"
Rev. Tony Lorenzen
First Parish Church
in Weston
July 8, 2007
Copyright, © Tony
Lorenzen, 2007
Lesson: Exodus 33:8-11
Gospel: John 15:12-17
Responsive Reading: "We Need One Another" --
George E. Odell
Minister: We need one another when we
mourn and would be comforted.
People:
We
need one another when we are in trouble and afraid.
Minister:
We
need one another when we are in despair,
and
need to be recalled to our best selves again.
People:
We
need one another when we would accomplish
some
great purpose, and cannot do it alone.
Minister:
We
need one another in the hour of success,
When
we look for someone to share our triumphs.
People:
We
need one another in the hour of defeat,
When
with encouragement we might endure, and stand again.
Minister:
We
need one another when we come to die,
and
would have gentle hands prepare us for the journey.
People:
All
our lives we are in need, and others are in need of us.
"Friendship demands a religious treatment," wrote
Ralph Waldo Emerson in his essay on the topic in 1841. "We talk of
choosing our friends," said Emerson, "but friends are self-selected.
Reverence is a great part of it ... should not the society of my friend be to
me poetic, pure, universal, and great as nature itself?" [1]
Emerson took friendship seriously. Friendship he says
demands religious treatment and is poetic and as great as nature itself. Not
only do we undervalue friendship today, but what we call friendship in our time
I dare to say often isn't friendship at all. How many people we call our
friends are but acquaintances? People we recognize, but do not truly know.
People with whom we are friendly, but who are not friends. As the writer of the
proverb states: "Some people play at friendship, but a true friend sticks
closer than one's nearest kin" (Proverbs 18:24).
We know God -- I am convinced -- through the people, places
and events of our lives. Friendship therefore is a sacred and holy calling. It
is not showy, it is not often recognized with liturgy and ritual, it is an
everyday thing. But it is friendship's cup-of-coffee-ness that makes it holy;
it's everydayness that makes it sacred. The holy, the sacred and the divine are
not reserved for the desert, the mountaintop, the temple, the monastery, and
the ornate ritual.
Friendship has taken a hard hit in the post-modern world.
Our lives our full of acquaintances, people we know from work and school and
even church, but friends, people who do the heavy lifting of relational life
who are not family, are harder and harder to come by. This is a shame says
Pastoral Psychologist Robert J. Wicks "because friends are not only
important for support, but are also necessary for psychological and spiritual
growth -- if you will, for holiness." [2]
This sermon series for the rest of July is based on the work
of Robert J. Wicks of Loyola College of Maryland. He deals with the theme of
friendship in two books: Touching the Holy: Ordinariness, Self-Esteem and
Friendship and A Circle of Friends: Encountering the Caring Voices in Your
Life, the second co-authored with Robert M. Hamma.
Wicks suggests that friends play four chief spiritual roles
in our lives and he names these roles The Cheerleader, The Prophet, The
Harasser and the Spiritual Guide. These roles or voices are self-descriptive.
The Cheerleader gives us positive reinforcement, picks us up when we're down,
encourages us to keep going, and tells us we're okay. The Prophet tells us what
we need to hear, but don't want to hear and points out to us what we don't want
to see, but need to see. The Spiritual Guide points the way to our deepest
beliefs, helps us see the light and find a way out of darkness. The Harasser
keeps at us, won't let us give up, and puts things in perspective when we blow
things out of proportion, keeping us from getting too full of ourselves by
throwing us a dose of humility.
Wicks also suggests that these spiritual friendship roles
may be better termed voices because a friend may speak in one or more of these
voices or fulfill one or more of these roles for us (and we for them) at
different times in our lives or at different times in our relationships.
Over the next three weeks, I will explore these various
roles or voices in some detail offering examples from my own friendships, the
work of Wicks and Hamma, reference to the scriptures and other spiritual
writers. I will also ask you to reflect on who fills these roles in your life,
who speaks to you in these voices and on the flip side, for whom do you fill
these roles, to whom do you speak in these voices of friendship? Are the
answers to any of these questions God?
We hear this morning that the Lord used to speak to Moses
"face to face, as one speaks to a friend." Interesting. How many of
us would claim to speak to God so directly? How many of us would want to? As if
God couldn't be such friend? As if it were crazy to assume God could?
In a world where so many people encounter each other online
at websites such as MySpace and Facebook, and online encounter is almost
normative, we need to remind ourselves that face to face relationship hasn't
lost it's place. Virtual, on-line communities have grown exponentially in
recent years and have left us on the shores of a vast new world, with immense
digital horizons to explore. These new virtual villages are not without their
merit and usefulness for outreach and their ability to help people to connect
to each other in a genuine fashion, but we still need to enter the tent of the
presence, not just of the presence of God, but of the presence of each other
where we encounter each other face to face, servants no longer, but friends.
Sometimes in my previous work as a hospice chaplain and
volunteer coordinator, I would arrange for volunteers to visit hospice
patients. Not only to play cards, or to read to a patient or to help with
grocery shopping or cleaning the house, but sometimes just to sit with someone
dying of cancer or liver failure. The patient just wanted someone to be there;
just wanted someone to be present. Sometimes the greatest role we can play as
friends is just to be there. That's something all the friends on your MySpace.com
page can't do is be at your side, even if their photo can be on your desktop.
Jesus tells his followers in this morning's Gospel reading
that he calls them servants no longer, but friends. A passage with many levels
of meaning for us -- The people in our lives are not for our utilitarian
purposes, to serve our needs, but for deeper relationship. The disciples are
being called to more intimate relationship not just in service to the mission
of the Good News, but in relationship to their teacher and to each other.
Today I will focus a bit on the role or voice of the
Harasser. Next week on the Cheerleader, the week after on the Prophet and
conclude by looking at friends as Spiritual Guides.
"A spiritual friend," filling any of these roles
or speaking in any of these voices, is, according to Wicks and Hamma,
"someone with whom we can celebrate God's presence and action in our
lives. There is a freedom in the relationship to talk about what we hear God
saying to us, how we discovered God anew, or where we feel God is present in
our lives at this moment." [3]
The great and oft-quoted Greek sage Anonymous said of
friendship that a "friend is a person who knows the song in your heart and
can sing it back to you when you've forgotten how it goes."
Wicks and Hamma put it this way, "A spiritual companion
is someone with whom we can discuss the motivations that keep us going in life,
someone who helps us remember why we are doing what we do." [4]
I also think that a friend of this nature is in it for the long
haul. Not that a casual acquaintance can't offer valuable insight or be of
great help, but a relationship you turn to and re-turn to that someone who is a
companion on the journey. Often the voice of the friend is the voice of God,
the voice of Christ, the voice of the divine speaking to us, if we have ears to
hear.
Wicks and Hamma admit that the term Harasser isn't a very
positive one for spiritual friendship and in their book they ask the question,
"How can we harass people in a positive way?" Their answer is that
positive harassment is "harassing back." They note that people have a
habit of putting themselves down, blowing a negative experience out of
proportion and generally slipping into habits of poor self-esteem. They state
it this way: "Positive harassment is not degrading, but upgrading; rather
than demeaning it helps us find meaning; instead of humiliating us, it points
us toward humility." [5] The way I like to think of it is: Am I bugging
you? Good. You're full of yourself.
My friend John owns the gym in town where I work out. He's a
harasser. "Are you sure that machine won't go any slower?" is one of
his favorite lines. "Heavy day?" he'll ask, if he sees one 45 pound
plate on each end of the bar bell, knowing I can lift more. He knows the struggles
I've had keeping my weight down and coming back from a couple of injuries. He's
never sarcastic, always light hearted, but always reminding me about taking
care of myself.
My friend Jill is a doctor, a M.D. "How's your
asthma?" It's always one of the first questions out of her mouth. How's
Tina? How's Zackary? How's your asthma? It's like asthma is a part of the
family. I'd like to forget about asthma. If you have asthma, you'd probably
like to forget about it, too, but my friend Jill is a M.D. and she has asthma,
and cares about how I'm taking care of myself.
My Zen teachers Melissa and David are harassers. I think
spiritual guides have it in their contracts to double as harassers. If you've
ever been to a meeting with a zen teacher, you know what harassment they can
cause. Does a dog have Buddha nature? What's the color of mu? What does mu
sound like? What's the sound of a single hand? Show me, don't explain it to me?
When you hear the sound of the single hand, you become the Buddha. How do you become
the Buddha? It's hard to be full of yourself as a holy person minister type
with the teacher throwing it at you that you aren't so enlightened after all.
Oh, the harassment of it all!
Sometimes friends offer us a harassing voice, calling us to
true humility and don't even know that they've done so. I have such a friend.
She used to preach from this pulpit in the summers. The Rev. Dr. Suzanne
Spencer, now a novice in the Episcopalian order of women religious The
Community of the Holy Spirit, would often pray using the words, "Jesus
came so that we might have life and have it more abundantly." This became
almost a mantra to Sue Spencer's prayer, at least that's how I heard it. When I
first started on the staff at First Parish Church, I wanted to run away from
this line. It sounded too high church -- too, well Catholic for this old
Catholic boy. But this line called to me. What does it mean to have life? To
have it more abundantly? It invited me, called me, made me reflect. What did
Jesus ask of his followers, but in the words in of the prophet Micah, "to
do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God."
In time, I came to relish the moments of prayer when Sue
Spencer would speak these words about Jesus coming so that I could have life more
abundantly. She was harassing me, pointing me toward true humility.
Jesus, himself was a pretty good harasser, too.
*
"Why do you see the speck in your neighbor's eye, but do not notice the
log in your own eye?" (Matthew 7:3, Luke 6:41)
*
"If any place will not welcome you and they refuse to hear you, as you
leave, shake off the dust that is on your feet as a testimony against
them." (Mark 6:11)
*
"For truly I tell you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you
will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and
nothing will be impossible for you." (Matthew 17:20)
I'm telling you, Jesus just kept harassing his friends with
this stuff. Over and over and over again. Upgrading them and helping them find
the meaning in it and pointing them toward a true humility that doesn't just
blindly subjugate the self, but sees the self in healthy relationships and
seeks to serves others. He harassed them again and again and again.
They needed harassing. They argued about who would get to be
his right hand man. They were always asking follow-up questions that would make
a high school teacher say something like "weren't you paying attention,
Matthew? You really must take better notes."
There were no digs, no retorts, no sarcasm, no biting humor
or inside jokes. He just kept on being there and reminding them and teaching
them and laying it out again and again until he could call them students and
disciples and servants no longer; until he had to call them the only word that
really fit, the word that described a relationship of presence and mutuality; a
word that spoke of a relationship that was poetic, pure, universal, and as
great as nature itself. He finally had to name them something that demanded
spiritual and religious definition: Friends.
So the task for us becomes to discern who speaks with this
harassing voice in my life? Who fills this role in my life? And for further
discernment, for whom do I fill this role, to whom do I speak in the voice of
the harasser?
Let me ask you: Who calls you to humility? Who reminds you
not to blow things out of proportion? Who calls you to find meaning again and
again and again when you are in a pattern of missing the point. AND ... is
there anyone in your life you help with these things? Think about it. This is
your task for this week. Am I buggin' you yet?
Maybe so. You can just think of me as a companion on the
journey, a harasser, that's how Robert Wicks would put it. Or as James Taylor
would phrase it, You've Got a Friend.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
[1] Emerson, Ralph Waldo, "Friendship" 1841 from
The Essential Writing of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Brooks Atkinson, Ed. Modern
Library/Random House, New York, 2000, pp. 201-214.
[2] Wicks, Robert J., Touching the Holy: Ordinariness,
Self-Esteem, and Friendship, Ave Maria Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1992, p. 94.
[3] Wicks, Robert J. and Robert M. Hamma, A Circle of
Friends, p. 23.
[4] Ibid, p. 23.
[5] Ibid, p. 78.